The Republican Party at a Crossroads
Jesus said this after being asked by his enemies if the Jews should pay taxes:
- If he answered Yes, they could brand him a sellout to the Roman occupation.
- If he answered No, they could report him to the Romans as a subversive.
He sidestepped the question entirely by saying the above.
Which brings me to last night’s vote. In all of these years of posting, I don’t think I’ve ever told you what political party I adhere to.
Growing up in the Reagan years, I’ve traditionally been a Republican and then, more recently, an Independent.
Like the Republicans, I want smaller government, less wasteful spending, and tighter reins on government programs.
But their social bent makes it difficult to see myself aligning with them in the near future, or ever again for that matter: The jaw-droppingly misplaced views on women’s rights, the virulent anti-immigration bent, and (most annoying to me as a practicing Christian that has actually read the Bible) the pseudo-Christianity.
My friends think I’ve moved left. I’ve not.
With the exception of certain items, my views have been fairly consistent through the years. It’s the political landscape that’s moved right. Even Obama, with the healthcare reform – a traditionally Republican ideal spearheaded by Nixon – his aggressive hunt for Bin Laden, and his extensive use of drones for strikes, is far more right than I would have expected.
Unfortunately, the right has moved ever more right as well, particularly socially. To the point that my vote is not wanted, even though it is needed. The same goes for the Hispanic and female vote, which were deciding factors in this last election.
So now the party has a choice: Continue to alienate the fiscally conservative but socially moderate voters like myself or tack back to the middle where compromise is a virtue not a vice.
Romney won more white male votes than any candidate ever – 6 out of 10 white males voted for him. And yet that was not enough.
Moreover, it will never again be enough.
So back to the Bible quote.
Papers are noting that the party is at a crossroads: continue to cling to this ridiculously intolerant RHINO Tea-Party view and become completely irrelevant OR see the world as it is.
My suggestion is to crack open the Bible and give that quote a re-read: Give unto Caesar (the government) what the government requires for you to survive and unto your own beliefs what you need to make it through your day.
The two are separate and should always remain separate. If God is god, he is god without needing a seat on Pennsylvania Avenue. If He’s not, the problem’s moot.
And here’s the main thing: Even the big guy Himself said that.
Every time I thought of calling or writing her, that sentence stopped me. And now
I’m happier for it we’re both happier for it.
Put another way, you don’t want me? Fine. I’m going to take my ball and go home.
God bless and protect the man and the office. Le Roi est mort, vive le Roi…
Location: going to the office for the first time in a while
Music: Why am I the one always packing all my stuff?
Like this post? Tell someone about it by clicking a button below.